Monthly Archives: July 2017

Birds avoid crossing roads to prevent predation

(Science Daily 19 July 2017)

Roads can be dangerous to wildlife. Animals making the perilous journey against the traffic run the risk of meeting an untimely death. Until recently, it was widely believed, unlike other animals, birds were largely unaffected by the presence of roads and traffic, simply because they could fly.

A new study, published in the open-access journal, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, reveals this is not the case. Birds can find roads challenging too – they are less likely to be found next to roads and are hesitant to cross them.

“We observed fewer bird species and individuals of each species near to roads. In addition, they were less likely to cross wide roads,” says Christopher Johnson, who completed this research as part of his graduate studies at the Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. “We found the smaller-bodied, forest-dependent species were the most affected, avoiding all but the narrowest of roads.

A keen bird-watcher, Mr. Johnson spent many hours carefully recording birds seen next to and crossing roads of different widths around the southern suburbs of Brisbane, Australia. He made sure that the vegetation on either side of the road of his recording sites were the same, as it was more likely that bird crossings occurred between similar habitats. These results were compared to the number of birds seen and heard in the vegetation 100m in from the roadside, to see if the species and numbers of individuals differed.

“For this study, we decided to try something new, by looking at the influence of different road widths (two, four and six-lanes) on bird crossings. In addition, we analyzed the road-crossing ability of birds of different body sizes and whether the type of bird, for example, small forest dependent, large forest dependent, honeyeater or urban tolerant species, had an effect,” explains Mr. Johnson.

The results were quite clear. The widest roads – six-lane carriageways – had fewer bird species and individuals of each species crossing them than the narrower two- and four-lane carriageways. When they looked at the different body sizes and bird types, it was the smaller forest-dependent species that showed the biggest difference.

The authors have suggested several reasons for these findings, such as birds choosing not to come out into the open for fear of predation and the creation of territorial boundaries, as breaks in vegetation can be used by birds to mark the edge of their territory. In addition, many highly aggressive, territorial bird species were seen to be taking advantage of the space near the roads, which would put off other birds crossing.

The findings of this study raises concerns, because bird species play an important role in the health of our natural environment.

Professor Darryl Jones, co-author of the study and Deputy Director of Environmental Futures Research Institute and the School of Environment at the Griffith University explains. “Birds perform a range of services that are of huge benefit to humans, from controlling pests such as mosquitoes and flies to the pollination and seed dispersal of many plants, including those of economic and medicinal value. By restricting bird movements through transportation networks, we are limiting their ability to perform these services and, ultimately, undermining the benefits we gain.”

The authors of the study strongly advise that measures are put in place to connect fragments of forest across roads, allowing wildlife to move freely.

“People use the road transport system to get from point a to b. Unfortunately, this has a negative impact on wildlife movement, particularly within urban environments,” says Daryl Evans, who also collaborated on this the research and is based at the Griffith University. “There are wildlife-friendly solutions to many of these issues, such as specially-designed overpasses, fauna underpasses and fencing so animals can avoid accessing the road, all of which need to be incorporated into the design of our road systems.”

“Further studies should look at the impacts of man-made breaks in vegetation, such as forest tracks and park walkways on bird movements,” adds Professor Jones. “We are currently using our data to identify the ‘at risk’ bird species within suburban areas, to assist with conservation management.”

Advertisements

These birds are trapped between predators and rising sea levels

seaside sparrow fledglings Mary Beth Griggs July 12, 2017

Probing its beak into the soft mud, looking for seeds or insects, the Seaside Sparrow is a common sight on the southeastern coasts of the United States.

Biologist Elizabeth Hunter started studying the small birds as a part of her dissertation at the University of Georgia. She wanted to know how sea level rise—which is already happening in Georgia at a rate of 3 mm/year—would threaten the sparrows. Then, she noticed something surprising.

“Over three years of collecting field data on Seaside Sparrow nesting success, I noticed that many more nests were being eaten by predators than being flooded by high tides,” Hunter said in an e-mail to Popular Science.

Not wanting to overlook an important threat to the population, Hunter, now at the University of Nevada, Reno, decided to create a mathematical model that would take both predation and sea-level rise into account. She found that while flooded nests were a threat to Seaside Sparrows, they were far more likely to build their nests lower in shrubs where predators were less likely to reach them, even if that meant their nest might get flooded more often.

Hunter says that sea level rise has made the risk of Seaside Sparrow nests flooding five to ten times more likely now than in the 1980’s. When a nest floods while empty, or when a few eggs are tucked inside, the flooding is generally manageable. So long as the eggs don’t float away, the sparrows can rebuild.

“The danger is when the nest has nestlings. Nestlings stay in the nest for 10 days after they hatch until they fledge, and if the nests floods while they are still in it, they can drown,” Hunter said. “Adults themselves aren’t really affected by flooding, but they do have to expend more effort to make a new nest and care for eggs and hatchlings if a nest is lost.”

In addition to the threat of the rising sea, the sparrows face assaults from the sky and the land. Fish crows, grackles, red-winged blackbirds, and marsh wrens attack from above, while raccoons, mink, and marsh rice rats mount a ground assault.

During seasons when predator activity was high, the sparrows kept their nests low to the ground. When they lost a nest due to flooding, they built higher, but the predator pressure weighed heavier in their choices than the flooding experience. Caught between gnashing teeth and the deep blue sea, Hunter estimates that predators are about seven times more important than sea level rise in Seaside Sparrows choosing their nesting location. Her research was published today in The Condor: Ornithological Applications.

Luckily, even though Georgia is expected to get one meter (three feet) of sea level rise by 2100—further squeezing the seaside sparrow habitat—there is hope. Hunter says that there is a chance that if humans can lessen the predator impact by putting fencing or modified cages around nesting areas, they might be able to encourage sparrows to move to higher ground. The research could also help other wildlife management teams plan out a future that keeps other birds living high and dry.

Danmark får ingen unge kongeørne i år

Jan Skriver 12 juli 2017)

De fire ynglende kongeørnepar i Nordjylland, der huser den samlede danske bestand, har i år deres ringeste ynglesæson nogensinde. For første gang i knap 20 år glipper det med frugtbarhed blandt de store rovfugle. Koldt vejr, alderdom og æggetyve blandt rovdyr kan være blandt forklaringerne på den golde sæson

Efter knap to årtier med frugtbarhed og stor stabilitet på hjemmefronten blandt Danmarks ynglende kongeørne ender 2017 som en sæson uden nyt liv.

Det er formentlig et sammenfald af uheldige omstændigheder, som bevirker, at der ikke kommer unge danske kongeørne på vingerne denne sommer. Og der er næppe grund til panik på artens vegne de kommende år, mener ornitologen Tscherning Clausen, der er Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings (DOF) artscaretaker for kongeørnen. Han samler alle data om ørnene, og sammen med fire redekoordinatorer holder han et vågent øje med udviklingen i bestanden.

”Indtil i år har de danske kongeørne været usædvanligt frugtbare, hvis man for eksempel sammenligner med deres svenske artsfæller. De danske ørne har indtil 2017 fået unger på vingerne 18 år i træk. At det glipper i år, kan måske skyldes et meget koldt vejrlig netop i den periode, hvor ørneæggene klækkede. Det kan også spille ind, at alderen begynder at trykke hos i hvert fald et af parrene. Og måske spiller rovdyr som mårer en rolle som æggerøvere. Vi har på ørne-webben hos DOF set, at en husmår er i stand til at kravle op i en havørnerede og æde æggene. Det samme kan ske for kongeørne”, siger Tscherning Clausen, der påpeger, at store rovfugle ofte springer en sæson over, uden at det nødvendigvis påvirker deres tilstedeværelse året efter på et givent territorium.

Svenske ørne holder pauser

”Fra Sverige ved vi, at kongeørne ganske ofte tager en pause med ynglen. Nogle gange kan de springe en sæson over hvert andet eller tredje år. Her må vi sige, at de danske ørne til sammenligning har været ekstremt stabile og frugtbare lige siden artens indvandring. For eksempel har ørneparret i Høstemark Skov i Lille Vildmose fostret en flyvefærdig unge 14 år i træk. I år er første sæson, det glipper for parret, hvor fuglene er omkring 20 år gamle. Selv om kongeørne formentlig kan blive op imod 25-30 år i naturen og i fangenskab endnu ældre, kan alderen måske begynde at resultere i en ringere frugtbarhed hos Høstemarkfuglene”, siger Tscherning Clausen.

Lovende start, skidt finale

Tidligt på sæsonen 2017 så det ellers lovende ud for de fire kongeørnepar i henholdsvis Store Vildmose, Hals Nørreskov samt Høstemark Skov og Tofte Skov i Lille Vildmose, oplyser DOF’s artscaretaker.

Det nye ynglepar, der i 2016 etablerede sig i Store Vildmose, byggede i år en ny rede, men parret opgav tidligt 2017-sæsonen. I Hals Nørreskov, hvor ørnene har ynglet siden 2007, opgav parret i begyndelsen af juni.

Også i Tofte Skov, hvor et nyetableret par byggede rede, og i Høstemark Skov, hvor de erfarne ørne residerer, tegnede det godt tidligt på foråret.

”Fælles for alle parrene har været, at de formentlig har nået at lægge æg og ruge en tid, inden det er gået galt. På sin vis er det ikke overraskende, at de nyetablerede ynglepar i Store Vildmose og det i Tofte Skov mislykkes med familielivet. Det ser man ofte hos store rovfugle. Men vi er overraskede over, at de veletablerede og meget stedfaste ørne i Hals og Høstemark fejler i år”, siger Tscherning Clausen.

To nordjyske revirer på vej

To af fire unge kongeørne, som i forskningens tjeneste er udstyret med GPS-sendere, sender fortsat data om deres færden i landskabet.

Begge disse fugle giver på sin vis løfter om fremtidig frugtbarhed, for de opholder sig meget stabilt i velegnede yngleterræner for kongeørne.

”Den ene af de GPS-mærkede ørne har længe holdt til i moserne nord for Frederikshavn, hvor Råbjerg Moses store uforstyrrede flader må betragtes som et realistisk kommende fast revir for kongeørn. Også den anden GPS-ørn har realistiske muligheder for at etablere sig i det område, hvor den længe har holdt til. Det er nemlig i Hals Sønderskov, der ligesom Hals Nørreskov må siges at være et gæstfrit ørneteræn”, siger Tscherning Clausen.

Nye ørneterræner i sigte

Trods den ringe sæson 2017 har de danske kongeørne gjort deres til at give arten luft under vingerne. I alt er der fostret 37 udfløjne unger i Danmark i perioden 1998-2016. Der menes at være plads, føde og territorier til måske en halv snes kongeørnepar i det danske landskab.

Ovstrup Hede ved Herning og Borris Hede øst for Skjern er realistiske mulige ynglesteder. Også Randbøl Hede og Harrild Hede i Sydjylland, der tidligere har haft besøg af kongeørne, er potentielle yngleområder.

Der skønnes også at være muligheder for flere par kongeørne i Thy, Hanherred, og i de store hedeplantager i Midtjylland. Også Vendsyssel kan komme yderligere med som ørneterræn, blandt andet i Jyske Ås-området.

Researchers in Cambodia find nest of rare riverine bird

(Physorg 20 July 2017)

Wildlife researchers in Cambodia have found a breeding location for the masked finfoot, one of the world’s most endangered birds, raising hopes of its continuing survival.

The New York-based Wildlife Conservation Society said Thursday its scientists, along with conservationists from Cambodia’s Environment Ministry and residents along the Memay river in the Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, discovered the only confirmed breeding location in Cambodia for the very rare species.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature has placed the bird on its red list of globally endangered species because its worldwide population of less than 1,000 is declining at an alarming rate. It is found only in Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.

Poaching and cutting down the trees where the bird lives are causing the population decline, said Eng Mengey, a communications officer at the Wildlife Conservation Society.

The Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary is one of several in Cambodia’s Preah Vihear province that are home to many endangered bird species, including the critically endangered giant ibis and white-shouldered ibis, the Wildlife Conservation Society said.

“This finding provides further evidence that the Northern Plains of Cambodia is an important biodiversity hotspot and critical area for conserving breeding habitat for globally threatened water birds,” Alistair Mould, a technical adviser for the society, said in a statement.

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-07-cambodia-rare-riverine-bird.html#jCp

Rural structures pose greater relative threat to birds than urban ones

 

Bird_mortality_chart.jpg
(Peter Kelley 21 July 2017)

About one billion birds are killed every year when they unwittingly fly into human-made objects such as buildings with reflective windows. Such collisions are the largest unintended human cause of bird deaths worldwide—and they are a serious concern for conservationists.

A new paper published in June in the journal Biological Conservation finds that, as one might suspect, smaller buildings cause fewer bird deaths than do bigger buildings. But the research team of about 60—including three co-authors with the University of Washington—also found that larger buildings in rural areas pose a greater threat to birds than if those same-sized buildings were located in an urban area.

Lead author of the paper is Stephen B. Hager, professor of biology at Augustana College in Rock Island, Illinois. Co-author Karen Dyson, an urban design and planning doctoral candidate in the UW College of Built Environments helped collect bird-collision data and assisted in editing the paper, along with UW alumni Anqi Chen and Carolyn Foster.

The research team monitored 300 buildings of varying size and environmental surroundings for bird mortality at 40 college and university campuses in North America in the autumn of 2014. This included six buildings on the UW’s Seattle campus. They designed a standardized monitoring protocol so that the field crews documented bird mortality uniformly. In all, they documented 324 bird carcasses of 41 species. At each site, somewhere between zero and 34 birds met their feathery demise.

“Consistent with previous studies, we found that building size had a strong positive effect on bird-window collision mortality,” Hager and team wrote in a statement about the continent-wide research. “But the strength of the effect on mortality depended on regional urbanization.”

Why is that? The researchers think it might be related to how birds select habitats during migration, and differences in bird behavior between urban and rural populations. For example, they write, forest-adapted birds often select rural habitats with lots of open space and fairly few impervious surfaces over more urban areas.

Lighting patterns may also play a part, they reason. Lights from large, low-rise buildings in rural areas may act to attract migrating birds in what the team dubbed a “large-scale beacon effect,” where this effect may be “more diluted among large buildings in urban areas.”

Another theory is that urban birds may actually learn from “non-fatal” collisions and gain “new anti-collision behaviors” that help them avoid colliding with windows in urban areas. Previous research, they note, “suggests that the relatively large brain size in birds makes them primed for learning.”

The results suggest, the authors write, that measures taken to prevent bird collisions “should be prioritized at large buildings in regions of low urbanization throughout North America.”

Tiny songbird won’t be silenced

(Joann Adkins 14 July 2017)

On a quiet, 30-acre property near West Palm Beach, Fla., 19 Florida grasshopper sparrows are starting to sing.

These tiny songbirds bask in the breezes that flow through their custom enclosure. They know the nesting season is near. Named for their song, which resembles the sounds of grasshoppers, the sparrows are blissfully unaware that they are among the last of their kind. These birds share the property with a motley crew of endangered wildlife. There are the east African bongo antelopes, living far from the poachers and habitat destruction that have pushed their species to the brink of extinction. Golden lion tamarins can be seen across the way, part of a 40-year breeding program that has helped restore the species in the forests of Brazil. Large birds and tiny primates make up the rest of the residents of the property. They are part of a broad initiative in the Tropical Conservation Institute (TCI), a collaboration between FIU and the Rare Species Conservatory Foundation (RSCF).

The Florida grasshopper sparrows are the newest addition to the RSCF property. Less than 60 breeding pairs remain in the wild today, according to Karl Miller with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Some say it could be fewer than 25. At about an ounce, the bird’s tiny size makes it difficult to find. Their cryptic coloring of brown feathers with flecks of gray works like camouflage. They’re also very elusive, so keeping tabs on them is difficult. Yet, scientists know it is one of the most imperiled birds on the planet. FIU conservationist Paul Reillo is more blunt.

“This bird is going to go extinct in the wild. There’s no question about that.”

Reillo is the director of TCI and founder of RSCF. For 35 years, the biologist has fought to save species through field-based conservation and, when necessary, captive-breeding programs. The team of researchers that make up TCI is working across the world to protect and restore populations of birds, land animals and marine species. The institute has received core funding support from the Batchelor Foundation to help sustain its programs. Nearly every species the researchers are working with are fighting for survival. Many are winning.

In the 1980s, populations of the red-browed Amazon parrot were falling to desperately low numbers. The species, with its distinctive green feathers and striking red crown, appeared to be headed for extinction, nothing more than a footnote in the history of the planet’s biodiversity. Reillo and the RSCF team gave captive breeding a try.

They started with 11 birds. Today, nearly 30 years later, the red-brow’s numbers have grown to nearly 100 in captivity, and are making a comeback in the wild. Reillo thinks the same could happen for the Florida grasshopper sparrow.

“It’s a species on life support,” he said. “We need to pull out all the stops this year. There is definitely optimism around here, but this bird is facing its end. It’s scary.”

The Florida grasshopper sparrow has been listed as an endangered species since 1986. It is not a migratory bird and historically was only known to nest in the dry prairie grasses of central and southern Florida. As much as 90 percent of the sparrow’s natural habitat has been developed, and today there is only one area left in the wild where the sparrows are known to reside—a swath of land not far from Walt Disney World. The sparrow population in that area has experienced a brutal decline in the past five years.

In 2015, seven young hatchlings, some abandoned and the rest from nests expected to fail, were put into the care of Reillo and his team—the first time the species was brought into captivity. Reillo was expecting a slow start, but the captive clutch shocked everyone when two birds mated and produced four hatchlings in the first year. The team had little time to celebrate because, soon after, heavy rains flooded the prairie. State and federal wildlife officials recovered as many eggs as they could and brought those to Reillo for incubation and rearing.

“This little bird is doing everything to stay on planet Earth, but the odds are against it,” Reillo said. “We have problems on every front. Financial. Disease. Habitat.”

When asked if the Florida grasshopper sparrow can elude extinction, Reillo doesn’t have an answer. But with so few left on the planet, he says captive breeding is the difference between this bird being here and not.

Sandra Sneckenberger, an endangered species recovery biologist with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, says the Florida grasshopper sparrow is a tough species to take on. Few were willing to be involved in a captive breeding program, she said, but federal officials knew Reillo and his team could give the sparrow a fighting chance.

The species presents unique challenges for scientists. The bird’s size makes it difficult to handle and nearly impossible to examine. No long-term captive-breeding program exists for similar sparrow species, so the team has no template to follow. Little is known about their immunity or to what diseases they are susceptible. Scientists often recover remains of animals to investigate cause of death and determine if populations suffer from parasitic diseases, bacterial infections or other illnesses. But just as their size and secretive nature make them difficult to locate while alive, it’s nearly impossible to find the bodies of Florida grasshopper sparrows when they die. Since first being placed into captivity, a few were discovered to be carriers of a disease from the wild population.

Read more

Clever crows can plan for the future like humans do

Clever crows can plan for the future like humans do

(Markus Boeckle And Professor Nicky Clayton 14 July 2017)

This contrasts with all of the previous studies in future planning, which have focused on naturally occurring behaviour. For example, we know that California scrub jays cache their food according to their future needs. And that bonobos, chimpanzees and orangutans select, transport and save appropriate tools for future needs.

General intelligence

These studies have shown that animals can plan for the future – but they left an important question open for debate. Are animals only able to plan to use abilities that have evolved to give them a specific advantage, or can they flexibly and intelligently apply planning behaviour across various actions? Most critics would say the former, as the animals were tested in naturally occurring behaviours.

But the new research provides the first compelling evidence that animal species can plan for the future using behaviour that doesn’t typically occur in nature. This supports the view that at least some cognitive abilities in animals don’t evolve just in response to specific problems. Instead, it suggests that animals can apply these behaviours flexibly across problems in a similar way to humans.

It seems that, in corvids and apes, intelligence is not a system to solve a predefined set of problems (dedicated intelligence) but rather a computational system to improvise new solutions (improvisational intelligence). But it is still unclear what this cognitive system exactly is and how it evolved.

What’s needed now is neuro-biological evidence of general intelligence in animals. We also need to investigate how flexible and improvisational behaviour evolved. Then we might be able to see how crows’ ability to plan for the future fits in with their broader cognitive powers.

Humans aren’t as unique as we used to think. Not, at least when it comes to making plans for the future. Scientists originally thought humans were the only animals that made plans but, over the past decade, studies on non-human primates and the crow family have challenged this perspective.

For example, we’ve seen that these animals are able to store tools for later use, cache food in places where it will be needed the most, and hide pieces of the sort of food they know will be running low in the future.

In all these studies, the animals had to consider what to do, where to do it and when to prepare for certain specific future events. The latest research shows that ravens can indeed anticipate the “what, where and when” of a future event on the basis of previous experiences. But unlike the previous studies, this work tested the birds in behaviour they don’t normally show in the wild. This provides evidence that they have a much more general ability to plan for the future than previously thought.

Food hoarding is common in members of the crow family (corvids) because they often eat from perishable animal carcasses, which provide lots of food but are only available for a short amount of time. To create a suitable cache of food they need to work out what to store, where to put it and when to do so.

The new study, published in the journal Science, tested the birds outside this naturally occurring behaviour, which may have evolved specifically because it gives crows a survival advantage. Some crow species are known to naturally use tools to retrieve food. So the researchers tested whether the birds could store and retrieve a tool so they could get at their food after a gap of 17 hours – something we wouldn’t expect them to do naturally. The scientists didn’t give the birds a chance to learn this behaviour first but they were still able to instantly select the tool out of a number of unnecessary items.

In another experiment, the researchers taught ravens to select a token from a number of items that they could then exchange for food. Again, the birds then showed that they could plan for the future using this new behaviour. They were able to store this token and then retrieve and use it when they were offered the chance to exchange it for food 17 hours later.

This contrasts with all of the previous studies in future planning, which have focused on naturally occurring behaviour. For example, we know that California scrub jays cache their food according to their future needs. And that bonobos, chimpanzees and orangutans select, transport and save appropriate tools for future needs.

General intelligence

These studies have shown that animals can plan for the future – but they left an important question open for debate. Are animals only able to plan to use abilities that have evolved to give them a specific advantage, or can they flexibly and intelligently apply planning behaviour across various actions? Most critics would say the former, as the animals were tested in naturally occurring behaviours.

But the new research provides the first compelling evidence that animal species can plan for the future using behaviour that doesn’t typically occur in nature. This supports the view that at least some cognitive abilities in animals don’t evolve just in response to specific problems. Instead, it suggests that animals can apply these behaviours flexibly across problems in a similar way to humans.

It seems that, in corvids and apes, intelligence is not a system to solve a predefined set of problems (dedicated intelligence) but rather a computational system to improvise new solutions (improvisational intelligence). But it is still unclear what this cognitive system exactly is and how it evolved.

What’s needed now is neuro-biological evidence of general intelligence in animals. We also need to investigate how flexible and improvisational behaviour evolved. Then we might be able to see how crows’ ability to plan for the future fits in with their broader cognitive powers.